Benneworth, P. (2015). Tracing how arts and humanities research translates, circulates and consolidates in society. How have scholars been reacting to diverse impact and public value agendas? Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14(1), 45–60. http://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214533888 This article was part of a series concentrating on impact and value, and published in the journal Arts and […]
Category Archives: Reading
Readings in “value” June 2015 (1)
Olmos-Peñuela, J., Benneworth, P., & Castro-Martinez, E. (2015). Are sciences essential and humanities elective? Disentangling competing claims for humanities’ research public value. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14(1), 61–78. http://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214534081 Olmos-Peñuela et al. (2015) argue that it is incorrect, and perhaps even illogical, to argue that the humanities are a luxury.
Readings in heritage, February 2015
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 56(1-2), 52–65.
Readings in DH, January 2015
Hering, K., Kramer, M. J., Sternfeld, J., & Theimer, K. (2014). Digital Historiography and the Archives. Journal of Digital Humanities, 3(2). Retrieved from http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/3-2/digital-historiography-and-the-archives/
Readings in DH, December 2014 (2)
Warwick, C. (2012). Studying users in digital humanities. In C. Warwick, M. Terras, & J. Nyhan (Eds.), Digital Humanities in Practice (pp. 1 – 21). Oxford: Facet Publishing, Ltd.
Readings in Ethnography, December 2014
Hallett, R. E., & Barber, K. (2014). Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 306–330. doi:10.1177/0891241613497749
Readings in DH, December 2014 (1)
Warwick, C., Terras, M., Huntington, P., & Pappa, N. (2008). If you build it will they come? The LAIRAH study: quantifying the use of online resources in the arts and humanities through statistical analysis of user log data. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(1), 85–102.
Readings in DH, November 2014 (1)
Hsu, W. F. (2014). Digital Ethnography Toward Augmented Empiricism: A New Methodological Framework. Journal of Digital Humanities, 3(1). Retrieved from http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/3-1/digital-ethnography-toward-augmented-empiricism-by-wendy-hsu/ This paper addresses issues around digital ethnography, what does this mean as a method? Hsu’s paper is an attempt to address methodological aspects of digital ethnography, which she finds under-developed. Computers offer not just […]
Readings in DH, October 2014 (part 2)
Nowviskie, B., McClure, D., Graham, W., Soroka, A., Boggs, J., & Rochester, E. (2013). Geo-Temporal Interpretation of Archival Collections with Neatline. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 28(4), 692–699. doi:10.1093/llc/fqt043 This paper describes a tool for humanities data, Neatline, which was built with the declared aim of enabling expression of the “geo-temporal dimensions” of humanities datasets. It […]
Readings in oral history, October 2014 (part 3)
Freund, A. (2014). “Confessing animals”: toward a longue durée history of the oral history interview, Oral History Review, 41(1), 1-26. This paper by Freund presents some initial research exploring the link between the oral history interview and the development of a culture of confession in the late twentieth century. The origins of confessional culture are […]
